05 · Scoring weights
Stronger evidence carries more weight.
1Weak signal
2Meaningful
3Strong signal
Three weight bands, a cap on weak evidence, and a set of patterns that subtract. The whole scoring system fits on one page because it is meant to be read, not believed. The examples below are real indicators from the library.
| Band | Weight | What it means | A real indicator from the library |
| Weak signal | w = 1 | Common in ordinary conversation; counts for little on its own. | “Contacts you at extremely high frequency” — urgency is normal in human lives. |
| Meaningful signal | w = 2 | Unusual enough to matter, ordinary enough to have innocent explanations. | “Claims military deployment or overseas service” — a real job can also block a real video call. |
| Strong signal | w = 3 | Rarely appears outside a documented script. | “Supplies a wallet address” — the request to make the money unreturnable. |
Weak evidence is capped: structural findings from the link checker add at most four points to a hundred, and they cannot carry a high score on their own. Protective patterns subtract — a planned in-person meeting, a real-time video call with interaction, a refusal to discuss money. A score you can disagree with, line by line, is a score worth reading.